Screener
SPDF vs BALI
Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF vs iShares U.S. Large Cap Premium Income Active ETF
Key differences
- BALI costs 0.34% less per year.
- BALI is significantly larger than SPDF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPDF follows a active selection strategy; BALI uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPDF | BALI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $1.1B |
| Since | 2026 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 8.44% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +27.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.08% |
| Max drawdown | -1.90% | -16.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPDF and BALI
Explore further