Screener
SPDF vs BSR
Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF vs Pacific Select Fund
Key differences
- SPDF costs 0.40% less per year.
- BSR is significantly larger than SPDF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPDF is classified as equity, while BSR is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPDF | BSR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 1.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $39M |
| Since | 2026 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.02% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +12.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 8.71% |
| Max drawdown | -1.90% | -15.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPDF and BSR
Explore further