Screener
SPDF vs ESN
Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF vs Essential 40 Stock ETF
Key differences
- ESN is significantly larger than SPDF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ESN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPDF | ESN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.70% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $249M |
| Since | 2026 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +29.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 9.80% |
| Max drawdown | -1.90% | -13.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPDF and ESN
Explore further