Screener
SPDF vs IDEF
Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF vs iShares Defense Industrials Act
Key differences
- IDEF costs 0.14% less per year.
- IDEF is significantly larger than SPDF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPDF covers north america markets; IDEF covers global.
- SPDF follows a active selection strategy; IDEF uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPDF | IDEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $3.5B |
| Since | 2026 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +31.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 20.65% |
| Max drawdown | -1.90% | -14.63% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPDF and IDEF
Explore further