Screener
SPDF vs ITA
Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF vs iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF
Key differences
- ITA costs 0.31% less per year.
- ITA is significantly larger than SPDF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPDF follows a active selection strategy; ITA uses index tracking.
- ITA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPDF | ITA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $13.6B |
| Since | 2026 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +32.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +26.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +17.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 20.61% |
| Max drawdown | -1.90% | -51.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPDF and ITA
Explore further