Screener
SPDF vs RULE
Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF vs Adaptive Core ETF
Key differences
- SPDF costs 1.15% less per year.
- SPDF is classified as equity, while RULE is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- RULE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPDF | RULE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 1.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $14M |
| Since | 2026 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +41.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 19.69% |
| Max drawdown | -1.90% | -30.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPDF and RULE
Explore further