Screener
SPDF vs SHUS
Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF vs Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF
Key differences
- SPDF costs 0.10% less per year.
- SHUS is significantly larger than SPDF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPDF is classified as equity, while SHUS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- SPDF follows a active selection strategy; SHUS uses option income.
- SHUS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPDF | SHUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $24M |
| Since | 2026 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.29% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +17.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +10.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.61 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.18% |
| Max drawdown | -1.90% | -14.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPDF and SHUS
Explore further