Screener
SPDF vs ZOCT
Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF vs Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October
Key differences
- SPDF costs 0.10% less per year.
- ZOCT is significantly larger than SPDF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPDF is classified as equity, while ZOCT is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- SPDF follows a active selection strategy; ZOCT uses structured outcome.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPDF | ZOCT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $115M |
| Since | 2026 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +7.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 2.27% |
| Max drawdown | -1.90% | -3.18% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPDF and ZOCT
Explore further