Screener
SPDN vs TNA
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1X Shares vs Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
Key differences
- SPDN costs 0.57% less per year.
- TNA is significantly larger than SPDN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPDN follows a inverse strategy; TNA uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, TNA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- TNA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPDN | TNA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 1.05% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $219M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2016 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 3.94% | 0.44% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -18.4% | +130.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | -13.2% | +30.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -9.3% | -5.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -1.11 | 0.68 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.30% | 57.15% |
| Max drawdown | -75.08% | -88.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPDN and TNA
Explore further