Screener
SPDW vs URTH
State Street SPDR Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF vs iShares MSCI World ETF
Key differences
- SPDW costs 0.21% less per year.
- SPDW is significantly larger than URTH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPDW covers global ex us markets; URTH covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, URTH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SPDW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPDW | URTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $38.9B | $9.2B |
| Since | 2007 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 3.00% | 1.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.2% | +27.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | +21.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.7% | +12.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.57% | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -34.98% | -34.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPDW and URTH
Explore further