Screener
SPEM vs PEMX
State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF vs Putnam Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
Key differences
- SPEM costs 0.62% less per year.
- SPEM is significantly larger than PEMX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPEM follows a index tracking strategy; PEMX uses active selection.
- SPEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPEM | PEMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17.3B | $20M |
| Since | 2007 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.58% | 1.22% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +62.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.88% | 21.02% |
| Max drawdown | -36.06% | -14.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPEM and PEMX
Explore further