Screener
SPGM vs EMXC
State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
Key differences
- SPGM costs 0.16% less per year.
- EMXC is significantly larger than SPGM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPGM covers global markets; EMXC covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, EMXC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SPGM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPGM | EMXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $22.1B |
| Since | 2012 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.75% | 2.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.8% | +65.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | +27.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.0% | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.96% | 21.14% |
| Max drawdown | -33.97% | -42.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPGM and EMXC
Explore further