Screener
SPHD vs OMFL
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF vs Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- SPHD is classified as equity, while OMFL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- SPHD follows a index tracking strategy; OMFL uses systematic alpha.
- Over the last 3 years, OMFL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SPHD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPHD | OMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.3B | $4.6B |
| Since | 2012 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 4.37% | 0.78% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.6% | +25.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.2% | +14.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.2% | +9.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.06% | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -41.39% | -33.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPHD and OMFL
Explore further