Screener
SPHQ vs QFRD
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF vs Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF
Key differences
- SPHQ costs 0.34% less per year.
- SPHQ is significantly larger than QFRD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPHQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPHQ | QFRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17.3B | $1M |
| Since | 2005 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 1.11% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.27 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.73% | — |
| Max drawdown | -31.59% | -9.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPHQ and QFRD
Explore further