Screener
SPUS vs XOEF
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF vs iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF
Key differences
- XOEF costs 0.25% less per year.
- SPUS is significantly larger than XOEF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPUS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPUS | XOEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.4B | $20M |
| Since | 2019 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.57% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +17.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.25% | — |
| Max drawdown | -30.80% | -7.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPUS and XOEF
Explore further