Screener
SPXS vs TZA
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares
Key differences
- TZA costs 0.05% less per year.
- SPXS follows a leveraged strategy; TZA uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, SPXS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPXS | TZA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.04% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $388M | $270M |
| Since | 2008 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 4.29% | 4.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | -50.4% | -67.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | -43.7% | -46.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | -35.1% | -30.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -1.15 | -0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 36.05% | 57.16% |
| Max drawdown | -99.61% | -99.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPXS and TZA
Explore further