Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

SPXU vs SEF

ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 vs ProShares Short Financials

SPXU

ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500

ProShares

Annual cost

0.90%

Fund size

$562M

SEF

ProShares Short Financials

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$18M

Key differences

  • SPXU is significantly larger than SEF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, SEF has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

SPXUSEF
Annual cost (TER)0.90%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$562M$18M
Since20092008
Dividend yield6.87%3.44%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyinverseinverse
CAGR 1Y-52.5%+0.6%
CAGR 3Y-43.9%-10.8%
CAGR 5Y-35.8%-6.1%
Sharpe 3Y-1.17-0.86
Volatility 1Y35.84%14.40%
Max drawdown-99.61%-75.66%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to SPXU and SEF