Screener
SPXU vs SSO
ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 vs ProShares Ultra S&P500
Key differences
- SSO is significantly larger than SPXU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPXU follows a inverse strategy; SSO uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, SSO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPXU | SSO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.90% | 0.87% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $562M | $7.3B |
| Since | 2009 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 6.87% | 0.68% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -52.5% | +60.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | -43.9% | +39.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -35.8% | +20.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -1.17 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 35.84% | 23.92% |
| Max drawdown | -99.61% | -59.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPXU and SSO
Explore further