Screener
SPXV vs RSPH
ProShares S&P 500 ex-Health Care ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF
Key differences
- SPXV costs 0.31% less per year.
- RSPH is significantly larger than SPXV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SPXV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RSPH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPXV | RSPH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $38M | $685M |
| Since | 2015 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.94% | 0.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.4% | +10.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.2% | +2.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.4% | +2.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | 0.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.80% | 15.48% |
| Max drawdown | -34.34% | -30.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPXV and RSPH
Explore further