Screener
SPYG vs RZG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- SPYG costs 0.31% less per year.
- SPYG is significantly larger than RZG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SPYG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SPYG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPYG | RZG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $49.5B | $121M |
| Since | 2000 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.50% | 0.42% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.8% | +32.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.8% | +18.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.1% | +5.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | 0.76 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.15% | 18.58% |
| Max drawdown | -32.67% | -54.02% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPYG and RZG
Explore further