Screener
SQLT vs GQQQ
Ishares MSCI USA Small-Cap Quality Factor ETF vs Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF
Key differences
- SQLT costs 0.15% less per year.
- GQQQ is significantly larger than SQLT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SQLT follows a index tracking strategy; GQQQ uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| SQLT | GQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7M | $130M |
| Since | 2026 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.44% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +43.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.78% |
| Max drawdown | -3.95% | -22.36% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SQLT and GQQQ
Explore further