Skip to content
Screener

STOT vs MSTQ

State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF vs LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF

STOT

State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF

Annual cost

0.45%

Fund size

$461M

MSTQ

LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF

Annual cost

1.55%

Fund size

$39M

Key differences

STOT is a fixed income ETF, while MSTQ is an alternative ETF. STOT charges 0.45% a year and MSTQ 1.55%.

  • STOT is a fixed income fund, while MSTQ is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • STOT follows a active selection strategy; MSTQ uses option income.
  • STOT costs 1.10% less per year.
  • STOT is much larger than MSTQ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, MSTQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • STOT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

STOTMSTQ
Annual cost (TER)0.45%1.55%
Fund size (AUM)$461M$39M
Since20162022
Dividend yield4.41%0.65%
Asset classfixed incomealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionoption income
CAGR 1Y+4.3%+27.0%
CAGR 3Y+5.3%+23.5%
CAGR 5Y+2.8%N/A
Sharpe 3Y1.041.14
Volatility 1Y1.11%15.40%
Max drawdown-6.07%-31.05%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to STOT and MSTQ