Screener
STRN vs FSCS
SMART Trend 25 ETF vs First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF
Key differences
- STRN follows a active selection strategy; FSCS uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| STRN | FSCS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $58M |
| Since | — | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +2.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +11.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.00% |
| Max drawdown | -15.43% | -43.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to STRN and FSCS
Explore further