Screener
STRN vs IWB
SMART Trend 25 ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Key differences
- STRN follows a active selection strategy; IWB uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| STRN | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $46.2B |
| Since | — | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +29.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.07% |
| Max drawdown | -15.43% | -34.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to STRN and IWB
Explore further