Screener
STRN vs SMMD
SMART Trend 25 ETF vs iShares Russell 2500 ETF
Key differences
- STRN follows a active selection strategy; SMMD uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| STRN | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $3.0B |
| Since | — | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +39.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.31% |
| Max drawdown | -15.43% | -41.06% |
Similar to STRN and SMMD
Explore further