Screener
STRN vs RHRX
SMART Trend 25 ETF vs RH Tactical Rotation ETF
Key differences
- STRN is classified as equity, while RHRX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- STRN follows a active selection strategy; RHRX uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| STRN | RHRX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 1.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $34M |
| Since | — | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +42.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.30% |
| Max drawdown | -15.43% | -25.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to STRN and RHRX
Explore further