Screener
STRN vs SCHV
SMART Trend 25 ETF vs Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- STRN follows a active selection strategy; SCHV uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| STRN | SCHV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $15.2B |
| Since | — | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.85% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +29.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.71% |
| Max drawdown | -15.43% | -37.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to STRN and SCHV
Explore further