Screener
SUB vs BKMS
iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF vs BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF
Key differences
- SUB costs 0.28% less per year.
- SUB is significantly larger than BKMS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SUB follows a index tracking strategy; BKMS uses active selection.
- BKMS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SUB | BKMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11.1B | $438M |
| Since | 2008 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 2.48% | 2.43% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.39 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.00% | — |
| Max drawdown | -9.46% | -0.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SUB and BKMS
Explore further