Screener
SUB vs FUMB
iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF vs First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF
Key differences
Both SUB and FUMB are fixed income ETFs. SUB charges 0.07% a year and FUMB 0.29%. The main difference: SUB follows a index tracking strategy; FUMB uses active selection.
- SUB follows a index tracking strategy; FUMB uses active selection.
- SUB costs 0.22% less per year.
- SUB is much larger than FUMB. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- SUB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SUB | FUMB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11.3B | $231M |
| Since | 2008 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 2.51% | 2.80% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.0% | +2.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.2% | +3.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.5% | +2.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.30 | -0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.00% | 0.78% |
| Max drawdown | -9.46% | -2.68% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.