Screener
SUB vs SHV
iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF vs iShares 0–1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
Key differences
- SUB costs 0.08% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, SHV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SUB | SHV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11.1B | $20.6B |
| Since | 2008 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.48% | 3.92% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.1% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.0% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.4% | +3.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.39 | 4.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.00% | 0.21% |
| Max drawdown | -9.46% | -0.45% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SUB and SHV
Explore further