Screener
SUPP vs GRW
TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF vs TCW Durable Growth ETF
Key differences
- GRW is significantly larger than SUPP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GRW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SUPP | GRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12M | $72M |
| Since | 2023 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.30% | 0.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.8% | -7.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.39% | 14.49% |
| Max drawdown | -25.03% | -23.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SUPP and GRW
Explore further