Screener
SURE vs GLOF
AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF vs iShares Global Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- GLOF costs 0.70% less per year.
- GLOF is significantly larger than SURE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SURE follows a active selection strategy; GLOF uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, GLOF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SURE | GLOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.90% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $52M | $196M |
| Since | 2011 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.94% | 1.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.6% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.8% | +22.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | +12.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | 1.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.96% | 12.63% |
| Max drawdown | -35.68% | -34.12% |
Similar to SURE and GLOF
Explore further