Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

TAIL vs QTR

Cambria Tail Risk ETF vs Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF

TAIL

Cambria Tail Risk ETF

Annual cost

0.59%

Fund size

$157M

QTR

Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF

Annual cost

0.25%

Fund size

$3M

Key differences

  • QTR costs 0.34% less per year.
  • TAIL is significantly larger than QTR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • TAIL follows a tactical allocation strategy; QTR uses volatility strategy.
  • Over the last 3 years, QTR has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

TAILQTR
Annual cost (TER)0.59%0.25%
Fund size (AUM)$157M$3M
Since20172021
Dividend yield3.41%17.74%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategytactical allocationvolatility strategy
CAGR 1Y-9.0%+34.8%
CAGR 3Y-6.3%+25.2%
CAGR 5Y-8.5%N/A
Sharpe 3Y-0.641.25
Volatility 1Y8.55%14.14%
Max drawdown-52.37%-31.72%

Similar to TAIL and QTR