Screener
TAN vs EQAL
Invesco Solar ETF vs Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF
Key differences
- EQAL costs 0.50% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, EQAL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- TAN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TAN | EQAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $797M |
| Since | 2008 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.66% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +122.2% | +26.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +0.4% | +15.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.1% | +7.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.11 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 36.88% | 12.40% |
| Max drawdown | -78.53% | -40.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TAN and EQAL
Explore further