Screener
TAN vs PSCF
Invesco Solar ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF
Key differences
- PSCF costs 0.41% less per year.
- TAN is significantly larger than PSCF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PSCF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TAN | PSCF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $25M |
| Since | 2008 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +94.1% | +21.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.5% | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.4% | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.03 | 0.72 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.40% | 17.56% |
| Max drawdown | -78.53% | -45.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TAN and PSCF
Explore further