Screener
TAN vs KAUG
Invesco Solar ETF vs Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - August
Key differences
- TAN costs 0.09% less per year.
- TAN is significantly larger than KAUG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TAN is classified as equity, while KAUG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- TAN follows a index tracking strategy; KAUG uses structured outcome.
- TAN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TAN | KAUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $80M |
| Since | 2008 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +94.1% | +16.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.03 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.40% | 8.09% |
| Max drawdown | -78.53% | -15.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TAN and KAUG
Explore further