Screener
TAN vs RWL
Invesco Solar ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
Key differences
- RWL costs 0.31% less per year.
- RWL is significantly larger than TAN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TAN | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $8.8B |
| Since | 2008 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +94.1% | +27.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.5% | +20.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.4% | +12.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.03 | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.40% | 10.14% |
| Max drawdown | -78.53% | -36.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TAN and RWL
Explore further