Screener
TAN vs SMH
Invesco Solar ETF vs VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Key differences
- SMH costs 0.35% less per year.
- SMH is significantly larger than TAN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SMH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TAN | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $58.8B |
| Since | 2008 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.22% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +94.1% | +139.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.5% | +65.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.4% | +38.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.03 | 1.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.40% | 30.31% |
| Max drawdown | -78.53% | -45.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TAN and SMH
Explore further