Screener
TCHP vs TACU
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF vs T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF
Key differences
- TACU costs 0.57% less per year.
- TCHP is significantly larger than TACU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TCHP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TCHP | TACU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $14M |
| Since | 2020 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.22% | — |
| Max drawdown | -42.34% | -8.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TCHP and TACU
Explore further