Screener
TEK vs MOTO
iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF vs Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF
Key differences
- MOTO costs 0.07% less per year.
- TEK is significantly larger than MOTO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MOTO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TEK | MOTO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $37M | $10M |
| Since | 2024 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.37% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +64.4% | +56.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.50% | 21.11% |
| Max drawdown | -28.24% | -38.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TEK and MOTO
Explore further