Screener
TEKY vs FFND
Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF vs One Global ETF
Key differences
- TEKY costs 0.50% less per year.
- TEKY follows a index tracking strategy; FFND uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| TEKY | FFND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $52M | $99M |
| Since | 2025 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.23% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +45.3% | +23.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.01% | 12.97% |
| Max drawdown | -21.43% | -47.84% |
Similar to TEKY and FFND
Explore further