Screener
TEQI vs XUDV
T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF vs Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF
Key differences
- XUDV costs 0.45% less per year.
- TEQI is significantly larger than XUDV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TEQI follows a active selection strategy; XUDV uses index tracking.
- TEQI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TEQI | XUDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $403M | $64M |
| Since | 2020 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.57% | 3.60% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.4% | +33.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.61% | 12.27% |
| Max drawdown | -17.82% | -15.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TEQI and XUDV
Explore further