Screener
TFLO vs BRLN
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF vs iShares Floating Rate Loan Active ETF
Key differences
- TFLO costs 0.40% less per year.
- TFLO is significantly larger than BRLN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, BRLN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- TFLO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TFLO | BRLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.7B | $54M |
| Since | 2014 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 3.99% | 6.51% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.0% | +5.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.8% | +7.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 3.57 | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.28% | 3.03% |
| Max drawdown | -0.16% | -3.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TFLO and BRLN
Explore further