Screener
THIR vs QTAC
THOR Index Rotation ETF vs Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF
Key differences
- THIR costs 1.09% less per year.
- THIR is significantly larger than QTAC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- THIR is classified as equity, while QTAC is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- THIR follows a index tracking strategy; QTAC uses multi strategy.
Side-by-side comparison
| THIR | QTAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 1.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $210M | $54M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.59% | — |
| Max drawdown | -10.05% | -16.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to THIR and QTAC
Explore further