Screener
THRO vs BDYN
iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF vs iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- BDYN costs 0.17% less per year.
- THRO is significantly larger than BDYN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- THRO is classified as equity, while BDYN is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| THRO | BDYN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.3B | $2.7B |
| Since | 2021 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.17% | 0.96% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.26 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.11% | — |
| Max drawdown | -26.55% | -10.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to THRO and BDYN
Explore further