Screener
THRO vs ENHI
iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF vs iShares Enhanced International Active ETF
Key differences
- ENHI costs 0.30% less per year.
- THRO is significantly larger than ENHI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- THRO is classified as equity, while ENHI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- THRO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| THRO | ENHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.3B | $11M |
| Since | 2021 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.17% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.26 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.11% | — |
| Max drawdown | -26.55% | -5.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to THRO and ENHI
Explore further