Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

THRO vs BINC

iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF vs iShares Flexible Income Active ETF

THRO

iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF

BlackRock

Annual cost

0.57%

Fund size

$8.3B

BINC

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$16.9B

Key differences

  • BINC costs 0.17% less per year.
  • THRO is classified as equity, while BINC is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.

Side-by-side comparison

THROBINC
Annual cost (TER)0.57%0.40%
Fund size (AUM)$8.3B$16.9B
Since20212023
Dividend yield0.17%5.60%
Asset classequityfixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+28.9%+6.5%
CAGR 3Y+24.9%N/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y1.26N/A
Volatility 1Y13.11%2.29%
Max drawdown-26.55%-2.69%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to THRO and BINC