Screener
THRO vs BILT
iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF vs iShares Infrastructure Active ETF
Key differences
- THRO is significantly larger than BILT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| THRO | BILT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.3B | $26M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.17% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.26 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.11% | — |
| Max drawdown | -26.55% | -5.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to THRO and BILT
Explore further