Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

TINT vs PICK

ProShares Smart Materials ETF vs iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF

TINT

ProShares Smart Materials ETF

ProShares

Annual cost

0.58%

Fund size

$2M

PICK

iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$1.9B

Key differences

  • PICK costs 0.19% less per year.
  • PICK is significantly larger than TINT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, PICK has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • PICK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

TINTPICK
Annual cost (TER)0.58%0.39%
Fund size (AUM)$2M$1.9B
Since20212012
Dividend yield1.03%2.40%
Asset classequityequity
Region
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+50.2%+83.4%
CAGR 3Y+10.6%+22.2%
CAGR 5YN/A+11.7%
Sharpe 3Y0.420.77
Volatility 1Y23.73%27.81%
Max drawdown-41.29%-52.73%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to TINT and PICK