Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

TINT vs XME

ProShares Smart Materials ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF

TINT

ProShares Smart Materials ETF

ProShares

Annual cost

0.58%

Fund size

$2M

XME

State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF

State Street Investment Management

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$5.3B

Key differences

  • XME costs 0.23% less per year.
  • XME is significantly larger than TINT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, XME has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • XME has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

TINTXME
Annual cost (TER)0.58%0.35%
Fund size (AUM)$2M$5.3B
Since20212006
Dividend yield1.03%0.32%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+50.2%+106.2%
CAGR 3Y+10.6%+38.7%
CAGR 5YN/A+23.5%
Sharpe 3Y0.421.13
Volatility 1Y23.73%34.35%
Max drawdown-41.29%-61.69%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to TINT and XME